| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/30/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/30/1524077359.zrspam.308107_2018_04_18 |
From 9117-1348-4018576277-2082-christian.gabriel=shortnote.de@mail.netcomacce.science Wed Apr 18 20:49:19 2018
Return-Path: <9117-1348-4018576277-2082-christian.gabriel=shortnote.de@mail.netcomacce.science>
X-Original-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id 358553D200029; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:49:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:49:19 +0200
From: "DIY Smart Saw" <diymachine@netcomacce.science>
To: <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>
Subject: *****SPAM***** I've Heard of This DIY Hack but I Wasn't Sure It Actually Works
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:48:16 -0500
Message-Id: <5uha2vp4q08wn8gi-utlz71l4yw0gw2bp-ef869b95@netcomacce.science>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,
MPART_ALT_DIFF,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,
RCVD_IN_PSBL,RDNS_NONE,T_REMOTE_IMAGE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5AD7932F.2C8B7144"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5AD7932F.2C8B7144
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: This email must be viewed in HTML mode. You might have heard
about "the DIY machine you have to know how to build" . I thought it was
all a joke until I tried it out myself and let me tell you... it completely
blew my mind. [...]
Content analysis details: (6.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[64.42.181.221 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
background
0.8 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.4 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5AD7932F.2C8B7144
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from mars.netcomacce.science (unknown [64.42.181.221])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FD53D200028
for <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:49:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=netcomacce.science;
h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=diymachine@netcomacce.science;
bh=UlXZXjyP30vS8t9njiRBuTKZLrI=;
b=t0wPIrkQ6yCXDVO4eqO3mjykpl6lz7KRlyGspMppZ2A8z4O7/rHd/uJEMXxitGoKC/8rk1KLK5p/
MUgiQVEsaW1RYZNKqR+YTMjL+lVMCyXPAC8LjA6WX2zrli35ZEI/0Y456iFUsYCOpSCOAW/7WLhj
gw5A4Kv806pYYKSrHXg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=netcomacce.science;
b=D1I/v3bYiNuLBW6dHOyOht0W5YJZiM671pIF9AClYs9b9D3LWpHAviW78Dwa88qGsFVuMIAVD5Jt
1S0wc3XdgNpDSA3xi4obmitciNnLGBxAT6iii8Bzx+XWkhef2iMIv8Yx/BRkx187b1jAIpoQnKYf
DtT/3nKFu474uGXIu0g=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="83890093b45e63e0e18e1d638ee348b3"
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:48:16 -0500
From: "DIY Smart Saw" <diymachine@netcomacce.science>
Reply-To: "DIY Smart Saw" <diymachine@netcomacce.science>
Subject: I've Heard of This DIY Hack but I Wasn't Sure It Actually Works
To: <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>
Message-ID: <5uha2vp4q08wn8gi-utlz71l4yw0gw2bp-ef869b95@netcomacce.science>
--83890093b45e63e0e18e1d638ee348b3
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
This email must be viewed in HTML mode.
--83890093b45e63e0e18e1d638ee348b3
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">
</style>
</head>
<body><a href="http://netcomacce.science/9_7P3FTKG8zQJvOsBrswu_67f4nnXTwAUVSAmFbIgTkvFqgn"><img border="0" src="http://netcomacce.science/6eYL5k8igpTqJFF_HIw9MRvCcQNV8gecbIkS8iVnq6X0oaPV" /> </a>
<table align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="width:600px;font:20px;text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#000000; font-size:20px;font-family: Times New Roman;">You might have heard about <strong><a href="http://netcomacce.science/FXm1JavbhLicXtHzSnZKNmOe83hr1j91Leq2A5P3mYOom7dJ">"the DIY machine you have to know how to build" </a></strong>. I thought it was all a joke until I tried it out myself and let me tell you... it completely blew my mind.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://netcomacce.science/FXm1JavbhLicXtHzSnZKNmOe83hr1j91Leq2A5P3mYOom7dJ">Watch this short movie </a></strong>and see for yourself...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://netcomacce.science/FXm1JavbhLicXtHzSnZKNmOe83hr1j91Leq2A5P3mYOom7dJ"><img src="http://netcomacce.science/3d1359c54229ff9469.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
And...<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://netcomacce.science/FXm1JavbhLicXtHzSnZKNmOe83hr1j91Leq2A5P3mYOom7dJ">Click Here</a></strong> If You Want to Get the Fully Detailed Plans for This Machine </span><br />
<div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="font-family:Arial,Verdana,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#000000;"><span style="font-size:16px;"><a href="http://netcomacce.science/pmUEu4VtVStKQgkW5AsWB9RNJeDghzwK_guyMqhhx9pFpmYm"><img alt="To Unsub Click Here " src="http://netcomacce.science/c9acc53e81c488bd98.jpg" /></a> </span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<span style="font-size:16px;"> </span></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p class="size_Ramirez" style="color:#ffffff;">BreaManchester's first tram age began in 1877 with the first horse-drawn trams of Manchester Suburban Tramways Company. Electric traction was introduced in 1901, and the municipal Manchester Corporation Tramways expanded across the city. By 1930, Manchester's tram network had grown to 163 miles (262 km) route miles, making it the third largest tram system in the United Kingdom. After World War II, electric trolleybuses and motor buses began to be favoured by local authorities as a cheaper transport alternative, and by 1949 the last Manchester tram line was closed. Trolleybuses were withdrawn from Greater Manchester's railway network historically suffered from poor north–south connections due to the fact that Manchester's main railway stations, Piccadilly and Victoria, were built in the 1840s on peripheral locations outside Manchester City Centre. The central commercial district had no rail links, and over the years, a number of unsuccessful schemes were proposed to connect Manchester's rail termini. In the 1960s, transport design studies were undertaken to address the problems of increasing traffic congestion. A number of urban public transport schemes were evaluated for Manchester, including several types of monorail systems and metro-style systems. While the monorail schemes were all abandoned, a scheme to create an underground tunnel link gained momentum. SELNEC Passenger Transport Executive — the body formed in 1969 to improve public transport for Manchester and its surrounding municipalities – promoted the Picc-Vic tunnel project. This was a proposal to link Piccadilly and Victoria stations via a tunnel under the city centre and enable train services to run across the Manchester conurbation. Greater Manchester County Council (GMC) inherited the project and presented it to the United Kingdom Government in 1974, but the council failed to secure the necessary funding and the project was abandoned in 1977. Inter-station links were provided by the Centreline shuttle bus service for many years. Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive (GMPTE), the successor to SELNEC, continued to examine possible rail link solutions. Light rail emerged in the early 1980s as a cost-effective option that could make use of existing railway lines and run through the city centre at street level, eliminating the need for costly tunnelling works. A Rail Study Group, composed of officials from British Rail, GMC and GMPTE formally endorsed the Project Light Rail scheme in 1984. Initial abstract proposals, based on light rail systems in North America and continental Europe, illustrated a draft 62-mile (100 km) network consisting of three lines: Altrincham–Hadfield/Glossop, Bury–Marple/Rose Hill and Rochdale–East Didsbury. To promote the scheme, GMPTE held a public proof of concept demonstration in March 1987 using a Docklands Light Railway P86 train on a freight-only line adjacent to Debdale Park. The Project Light Rail proposals were presented to the UK Government for taxpayer funding; following route revisions in 1984 and 1987, Project Light Rail was approved. Because of central government's constraints on financial support for innovative transport projects, funding was granted by HM Treasury with the strict condition that the system be constructed in phases. Additional taxpayer funding came from the European Regional Development Fund and bank lending.</p>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p align="center"><a href="http://netcomacce.science/iS3aIOrOqhyNnSKOZ9rU44v3zd_6NYTqVVJhidKs9c69y8Tj"><img src="http://netcomacce.science/4c7ad856ca66d143f8.jpg" /></a></p>
</body>
</html>
--83890093b45e63e0e18e1d638ee348b3--
------------=_5AD7932F.2C8B7144--