| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/31/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/31/1525304038.zrspam.311887_2018_05_03 |
From 1445-1944-175132-378-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.fnisingtuch.bid Thu May 3 01:33:58 2018
Return-Path: <1445-1944-175132-378-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.fnisingtuch.bid>
X-Original-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id 782353D20003A; Thu, 3 May 2018 01:33:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Thu, 03 May 2018 01:33:58 +0200
From: "Finishing Touch Flawless" <contact@fnisingtuch.bid>
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Subject: *****SPAM***** Remove Hair Without Nicks, Burns or Irritation
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 01:07:46 +0200
Message-Id: <b3b72ujl4yb1o4vh-9vj6e4uiinmys3bw-798-2ac1c@fnisingtuch.bid>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_PSBL,RDNS_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,
URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5AEA4AE6.3A5D339B"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5AEA4AE6.3A5D339B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Remove Hair Without Nicks, Burns or Irritation http://fnisingtuch.bid/T1xdu7wsD1W0SbTOvVovho5tRzbFo9WrjyEt4fjAKH9oOA1u_175132_798_370222e3_0300
http://fnisingtuch.bid/clt6vmk4LwlCt5rqzL1DG76RJvOYj93u-AXGyGUwUC663nSQ_175132_798_203dea81_0300
[...]
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: him.in]
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[185.205.12.62 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
background
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5AEA4AE6.3A5D339B
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from george.fnisingtuch.bid (unknown [185.205.12.62])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15ED93D200016
for <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>; Thu, 3 May 2018 01:33:55 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=fnisingtuch.bid;
h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=contact@fnisingtuch.bid;
bh=tWAdHY35htbBeuJ6qEjIdUNCXho=;
b=Rk+Irx/8wl+5HSWplunCjNSga7lBZHpsyes5Gc3JBAArdyHgwyK8K/NGMfE6TGHjeLtibR8iTZzW
qDncEFmKshEYSuITF7oYoMmY3sqFmRWaMd0vNRgrwvHKsT288hR/zCK+l6sZrL85m2LyB63h1YoU
hvy5T7IAngtu3ioTWGE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=fnisingtuch.bid;
b=CW3QWV5hgk7zWHOD+IaWcIoEqt8NKVUNm4CGWlydpGwYVPOlHQOSq24qOnf8TDeqWRpzG2+sIq+k
F9rbKb1T2gW+DxR59oZS6EpIWt3Fam0AhctI1UvUdytczmVYcLNv8F8DWtTRhyC2zXN8uPNoZKG9
5A4sQJEvxlIUQi73hoE=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="d25feeccb7be9d20091cd5af1496496e_798_2ac1c"
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 01:07:46 +0200
From: "Finishing Touch Flawless" <contact@fnisingtuch.bid>
Reply-To: "Use FT Flawless" <support@fnisingtuch.bid>
Subject: Remove Hair Without Nicks, Burns or Irritation
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Message-ID: <b3b72ujl4yb1o4vh-9vj6e4uiinmys3bw-798-2ac1c@fnisingtuch.bid>
--d25feeccb7be9d20091cd5af1496496e_798_2ac1c
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Remove Hair Without Nicks, Burns or Irritation
http://fnisingtuch.bid/T1xdu7wsD1W0SbTOvVovho5tRzbFo9WrjyEt4fjAKH9oOA1u_175132_798_370222e3_0300
http://fnisingtuch.bid/clt6vmk4LwlCt5rqzL1DG76RJvOYj93u-AXGyGUwUC663nSQ_175132_798_203dea81_0300
n Through the Looking-Glass the character of Humpty Dumpty in response to Alices request explains to her the non-sense words from the first stanza of the poem however Carrolls personal commentary on several of the words differ from Humptys. For example following the poem a rath is described by Humpty as a sort of green pig. Carrolls notes for the original in Mischmasch suggest a rath is a species of Badger that lived chiefly on cheese and had smooth white hair long hind legs and short horns like a stag. The appendices to certain Looking Glass editions however state that the creature is a species of land turtle that lived on swallows and oysters. Later critics added their own interpretations of the lexicon often without reference to Carrolls own contextual commentary. An extended analysis of the poem and Carrolls commentary is given in the book The Annotated Alice by Martin Gardner.In Carroll asked his publishers Macmillan Have you any means or can you find any for printing a page or two in the next volume of Alice in reverse? It may be that Carroll was wanting to print the whole poem in mirror writing. Macmillan responded that it would cost a great deal more to do and this may have dissuaded him.In the authors note to the Christmas edition of Through the Looking-Glass Carroll writes The new words in the poem Jabberwocky have given rise to some differences of opinion as to their pronunciation so it may be well to give instructions on that point also. Pronounce slithy as if it were the two words sly thee: make the g hard in gyre and gimble: and pronounce rath to rhyme with bath.In the Preface to The Hunting of the Snark Carroll wrote Let me take this opportunity of answering a question that has often been asked me how to pronounce slithy toves. The i in slithy is long as in writhe and toves is pronounced so as to rhyme with groves. Again the first o in borogoves is pronounced like the o in borrow. I have heard people try to give it the sound of the o in worry. Such is Human Perversity.Though the poem contains many nonsensical words English syntax and poetic forms are observed such as the quatrain verses the general ABAB rhyme scheme and the iambic meter. Linguist Peter Lucas believes the nonsense term is inaccurate. The poem relies on a distortion of sense rather than non-sense allowing the reader to infer meaning and therefore engage with narrative while lexical allusions swim under the surface of the poem.
--d25feeccb7be9d20091cd5af1496496e_798_2ac1c
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Finishing Touch Flawless</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://fnisingtuch.bid/AeZPS8QHCCLEbJqAII9Oq6cOKXjFt0AYCU8VNMM1tEWi56UA_175132_798_70aebe25_0300"><img src="http://fnisingtuch.bid/d25e40065271496182.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.fnisingtuch.bid/vuHVpSK93znTuf7eZeLY-Jx4Bg2us0-U9qkCQT-Nsi1sNtFv_175132_798_ad17bbdf_0300" width="1" /></a><br />
<br />
<center>
<div style="width:500px;background-color:#ffffd2;border:15px groove #e25896;">
<div style="width:450px;text-align:left;"><strong style="font-family:Bell MT; font-size:22px;font-style:italic;color:#cc0000;">FLAWLESS™ By Finishing Touch® —The New GOLD Standard In Facial Hair Removal</strong><br />
<br />
<a href="http://fnisingtuch.bid/T1xdu7wsD1W0SbTOvVovho5tRzbFo9WrjyEt4fjAKH9oOA1u_175132_798_370222e3_0300" style="font-family:calibary;font-size:20px;">Learn More</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://fnisingtuch.bid/T1xdu7wsD1W0SbTOvVovho5tRzbFo9WrjyEt4fjAKH9oOA1u_175132_798_370222e3_0300"><img alt="" src="http://fnisingtuch.bid/1f179b3acb7aba8e15.jpg" /></a>
<p style="font-family:calibary;font-size:17px;">Finishing Touch Flawless is an 18-karat gold plated, hypo-allergenic facial hair remover that removes hair anywhere. Instantly and painlessly use the remover everyday without nicks or irritation, and is safe for all skin types and tones. Finishing Touch Flawless is gentle and safe to the touch, is dermatologist approved and unwanted hair won't grow back thicker.</p>
</div>
</div>
</center>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://fnisingtuch.bid/ZtarkRnqwOZ59V3eMhfLJFKXEXFJJUeHCYhW-X11cXfHuUAs_175132_798_d3e851d5_0300"><img alt=" " src="http://fnisingtuch.bid/a2dce92a26a1966278.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://fnisingtuch.bid/clt6vmk4LwlCt5rqzL1DG76RJvOYj93u-AXGyGUwUC663nSQ_175132_798_203dea81_0300"><img alt=" " src="http://fnisingtuch.bid/3d7211a6793b4caa59.jpg" /></a></center>
<center>
<p style="color:#ffffff;font-size:6px;width:500px;">n Through the Looking-Glass the character of Humpty Dumpty in response to Alices request explains to her the non-sense words from the first stanza of the poem however Carrolls personal commentary on several of the words differ from Humptys. For example following the poem a rath is described by Humpty as a sort of green pig. Carrolls notes for the original in Mischmasch suggest a rath is a species of Badger that lived chiefly on cheese and had smooth white hair long hind legs and short horns like a stag. The appendices to certain Looking Glass editions however state that the creature is a species of land turtle that lived on swallows and oysters. Later critics added their own interpretations of the lexicon often without reference to Carrolls own contextual commentary. An extended analysis of the poem and Carrolls commentary is given in the<a href="http://fnisingtuch.bid/AeZPS8QHCCLEbJqAII9Oq6cOKXjFt0AYCU8VNMM1tEWi56UA_175132_798_70aebe25_0300"><img src="http://fnisingtuch.bid/d25e40065271496182.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.fnisingtuch.bid/vuHVpSK93znTuf7eZeLY-Jx4Bg2us0-U9qkCQT-Nsi1sNtFv_175132_798_ad17bbdf_0300" width="1" /></a> book The Annotated Alice by Martin Gardner.In Carroll asked his publishers Macmillan Have you any means or can you find any for printing a page or two in the next volume of Alice in reverse? It may be that Carroll was wanting to print the whole poem in mirror writing. Macmillan responded that it would cost a great deal more to do and this may have dissuaded him.In the authors note to the Christmas edition of Through the Looking-Glass Carroll writes The new words in the poem Jabberwocky have given rise to some differences of opinion as to their pronunciation so it may be well to give instructions on that point also. Pronounce slithy as if it were the two words sly thee: make the g hard in gyre and gimble: and pronounce rath to rhyme with bath.In the Preface to The Hunting of the Snark Carroll wrote Let me take this opportunity of answering a question that has often been asked me how to pronounce slithy toves. The i in slithy is long as in writhe and toves is pronounced so as to rhyme with groves. Again the first o in borogoves is pronounced like the o in borrow. I have heard people try to give it the sound of the o in worry. Such is Human Perversity.Though the poem contains many nonsensical words English syntax and poetic forms are observed such as the quatrain verses the general ABAB rhyme scheme and the iambic meter. Linguist Peter Lucas believes the nonsense term is inaccurate. The poem relies on a distortion of sense rather than non-sense allowing the reader to infer meaning and therefore engage with narrative while lexical allusions swim under the surface of the poem.</p>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--d25feeccb7be9d20091cd5af1496496e_798_2ac1c--
------------=_5AEA4AE6.3A5D339B--