| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/31/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/31/1525630450.zrspam.312978_2018_05_06 |
From 1602-1944-175132-428-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.stopcatspry.bid Sun May 6 20:14:10 2018
Return-Path: <1602-1944-175132-428-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.stopcatspry.bid>
X-Original-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id C3B013D20003E; Sun, 6 May 2018 20:14:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Sun, 06 May 2018 20:14:10 +0200
From: "Cat Lovers" <info@stopcatspry.bid>
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Subject: *****SPAM***** Help for Cat Lovers and Extremely Frustrated Owners
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 19:36:13 +0200
Message-Id: <7bjgi1p00yfbab01-y6or0kf3upip1bhy-798-2ac1c@stopcatspry.bid>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_PSBL,RDNS_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,
T_REMOTE_IMAGE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5AEF45F2.5DA28B6C"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5AEF45F2.5DA28B6C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Help for Cat Lovers and Extremely Frustrated Owners http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-2-1944-428-828-4d776abf-0300
http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-20-1944-428-828-13b46d08-0300 [...]
Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[107.173.90.29 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
background
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5AEF45F2.5DA28B6C
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from jersey.stopcatspry.bid (unknown [107.173.90.29])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4933C3D20003A
for <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>; Sun, 6 May 2018 20:14:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=stopcatspry.bid;
h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=info@stopcatspry.bid;
bh=6N0kr0toRWa0gykxp45J6qb30A8=;
b=hRv637nukwcigU7yIgavsoLZaYKgDDGIS03LJvDzwYmtJ2W4hNcaI55uUDq/wmid/HIrF9aNwA/k
QGYcorlOuWWxeTw8VW+LU0eyFcTBNBLK7UG0WAyfO8Rl+enf4lDoSAWrgdVFvvOUtSnZYsF1z38G
v6dWRM866GXDscheWLY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=stopcatspry.bid;
b=SNKv5mCEsPVKIBNlAilBknQBCwDEm2HF1Nb/PRB7kU6uJSdvl9xqUV/Num8cJXxfEJhWY2Ntl+ZC
zbdl2m+yCfmYHFIWqnAFObdSLNlCM4WkX8aAvIjeuaSkdCP37bmYzYjv1kV7GAFORUuHqZtDOsWS
jTyOMn337EVBIJEfGT8=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="c94a5eeb713d33daa8d43b567b4b8777_798_2ac1c"
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 19:36:13 +0200
From: "Cat Lovers" <info@stopcatspry.bid>
Reply-To: "Cat Lovers" <info@stopcatspry.bid>
Subject: Help for Cat Lovers and Extremely Frustrated Owners
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Message-ID: <7bjgi1p00yfbab01-y6or0kf3upip1bhy-798-2ac1c@stopcatspry.bid>
--c94a5eeb713d33daa8d43b567b4b8777_798_2ac1c
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Help for Cat Lovers and Extremely Frustrated Owners
http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-2-1944-428-828-4d776abf-0300
http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-20-1944-428-828-13b46d08-0300
by Ernest Rutherford, who named Villard's rays "gamma rays" by analogy with the beta and alpha rays that Rutherford had differentiated in 1899. The "rays" emitted by radioactive elements were named in order of their power to penetrate various materials, using the first three letters of the Greek alphabet: alpha rays as the least penetrating, followed by beta rays, followed by gamma rays as the most penetrating. Rutherford also noted that gamma rays were not deflected (or at least, not easily deflected) by a magnetic field, another property making them unlike alpha and beta rays.
Gamma rays were first thought to be particles with mass, like alpha and beta rays. Rutherford initially believed that they might be extremely fast beta particles, but their failure to be deflected by a magnetic field indicated that they had no charge. In 1914, gamma rays were observed to be reflected from crystal surfaces, proving that they were electromagnetic radiation. Rutherford and his co-worker Edward Andrade measured the wavelengths of gamma rays from radium, and found that they were similar to X-rays, but with shorter wavelengths and (thus) higher frequency. This was eventually recognized as giving them also more energy per photon, as soon as the latter term became generally accepted. A gamma decay was then understood to usually emit a single gamma photon.
--c94a5eeb713d33daa8d43b567b4b8777_798_2ac1c
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Cat Stop Spray</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-0-1944-428-828-684045b2-0300"><img src="http://stopcatspry.bid/cd2b3f54789bcc333a.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-14-1944-428-828-63bc2db8-0300" width="1" /></a>
<div style="width:500px;text-align:justify;font-family:Arial;padding:10px;"><br />
Hello there,<br />
<br />
Last time I told you about the one thing from my kitchen that put me on track for finding a solution to my cat’s <strong>“spraying symphonies”</strong> Now, it’s time to tell you all about it…<br />
<br />
Cats hate them – because if they’re used right they act as natural cat repellents<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-2-1944-428-828-4d776abf-0300">But without something to back their action - you’ll end up working your life away for your cat Not good</a></strong><br />
<br />
<a href="http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-2-1944-428-828-4d776abf-0300"><img alt=" " src="http://stopcatspry.bid/fe97a6491582b74dff.jpg" style="border: 2px solid rgb(255, 233, 0);" /></a><br />
<br />
Remember – you want to stop the problem – and not just a temporary fix...<br />
<br />
<a href="http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-2-1944-428-828-4d776abf-0300"><strong>To Find Complete Soloution Click Here</strong></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<p style="color:#ffffff;font-size:8px;">by Ernest Rutherford, who named Villard's rays "gamma rays" by analogy with the beta and alpha rays that Rutherford had differentiated in 1899. The "rays" emitted by radioactive elements were named in order of their power to penetrate various materials, using the first three letters of the Greek alphabet: alpha rays as the least penetrating, followed by beta rays, followed by gamma rays as the most penetrating. Rutherford also noted that gamma rays were not deflected (or at least, not easily deflected) by a magnetic field, another property making them unlike alpha and beta rays. Gamma rays were first thought to be particl<a href="http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-0-1944-428-828-684045b2-0300"><img src="http://stopcatspry.bid/cd2b3f54789bcc333a.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-14-1944-428-828-63bc2db8-0300" width="1" /></a> es with mass, like alpha and beta rays. Rutherford initially believed that they might be extremely fast beta particles, but their failure to be deflected by a magnetic field indicated that they had no charge. In 1914, gamma rays were observed to be reflected from crystal surfaces, proving that they were electromagnetic radiation. Rutherford and his co-worker Edward Andrade measured the wavelengths of gamma rays from radium, and found that they were similar to X-rays, but with shorter wavelengths and (thus) higher frequency. This was eventually recognized as giving them also more energy per photon, as soon as the latter term became generally accepted. A gamma decay was then understood to usually emit a single gamma photon.</p>
<a href="http://stopcatspry.bid/clk.175132-1602-12-1944-428-828-5dfd566f-0300"><img alt="Unsubscribe-Here" src="http://stopcatspry.bid/a93420f193cd75b2e0.jpg" /></a></div>
</body>
</html>
--c94a5eeb713d33daa8d43b567b4b8777_798_2ac1c--
------------=_5AEF45F2.5DA28B6C--