| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/31/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/31/1527413824.zrspam.319812_2018_05_27 |
From 32745-30643-248207-6281-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.fbvstwittr.us Sun May 27 11:37:04 2018
Return-Path: <32745-30643-248207-6281-christian.gabriel=ift-informatik.de@mail.fbvstwittr.us>
X-Original-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id 2DB713D200050; Sun, 27 May 2018 11:37:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Sun, 27 May 2018 11:37:04 +0200
From: "Smart Consumer Rewards" <contact@fbvstwittr.us>
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Subject: *****SPAM***** Which social network is better?
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 05:36:49 -0400
Message-Id: <zlm79a86cv0bc3s3-lg1ydoba4qjf3ze1-77b3-3c98f@fbvstwittr.us>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,
RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5B0A7C40.2B1287F1"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5B0A7C40.2B1287F1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Which social network is better? http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-2-30643-6281-12299-6e1a4795-0300
http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-20-30643-6281-12299-95dbed83-0300 [...]
Content analysis details: (6.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: activity.to]
1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist
[URIs: fbvstwittr.us]
1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist
[URIs: fbvstwittr.us]
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[31.172.89.10 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
background
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5B0A7C40.2B1287F1
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from wilma.fbvstwittr.us (unknown [31.172.89.10])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBBD3D20004E
for <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>; Sun, 27 May 2018 11:37:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=fbvstwittr.us;
h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=contact@fbvstwittr.us;
bh=/llgI3uWq5NPaVf8aEBTM8P0rDE=;
b=UCYnuB5tSZe5gtXlx0DG9msCUsavWgRaQF73ll73nodGQ8tQ0ErxRclImNuP2tRzfnKiSWdzkQyh
O/JAzDN1XcbVaUe6VDfN/wH9Gc+ELbN2szyqPyqrcq8zrygc6ndE8UIwZL3cVq1pLI7tk9lQlWLU
O4PMY/EjT8+v39D4wfs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=fbvstwittr.us;
b=f8zI+EwquRQ44NXLYBt1Zt8LM0uWLxqvGOHsR+7OHMgjYHzVoIlzv3myY3C5NswqjzVSpFXvWUKz
nQizi5Z8GZ0s4DUcz0cbaiIqTSUPQSWuwR+PV7AKIcL+iMQa9ZvtBazlflyBhxlaRgOZ4bqJn3wy
k0M2LhX8LtFsgaCz8S4=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="d2bf8680bac31c8a2cc4277661d6e0f5_77b3_3c98f"
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 05:36:49 -0400
From: "Smart Consumer Rewards" <contact@fbvstwittr.us>
Reply-To: "Smart Consumer Rewards" <info@fbvstwittr.us>
Subject: Which social network is better?
To: <christian.gabriel@ift-informatik.de>
Message-ID: <zlm79a86cv0bc3s3-lg1ydoba4qjf3ze1-77b3-3c98f@fbvstwittr.us>
--d2bf8680bac31c8a2cc4277661d6e0f5_77b3_3c98f
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Which social network is better?
http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-2-30643-6281-12299-6e1a4795-0300
http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-20-30643-6281-12299-95dbed83-0300
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a relatively easy to measure surrogate for indoor pollutants emitted by humans, and correlates with human metabolic activity. Carbon dioxide at levels that are unusually high indoors may cause occupants to grow drowsy, to get headaches, or to function at lower activity levels. Outdoor CO2 levels are usually 350-450 ppm whereas the maximum indoor CO2 level considered acceptable is 1000 ppm. Humans are the main indoor source of carbon dioxide in most buildings. Indoor CO2 levels are an indicator of the adequacy of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor occupant density and metabolic activity.To eliminate most complaints, the total indoor CO2 level should be reduced to a difference of less than 600 ppm above outdoor levels.[citation needed] The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) considers that indoor air concentrations of carbon dioxide that exceed 1,000 ppm are a marker suggesting inadequate ventilation. The UK standards for schools say that carbon dioxide in all teaching and learning spaces, when measured at seated head height and averaged over the whole day should not exceed 1,500 ppm. The whole day refers to normal school hours (i.e. 9:00am to 3:30pm) and includes unoccupied periods such as lunch breaks. In Hong Kong, the EPD established indoor air quality objectives for office buildings and public places in which a carbon dioxide level below 1,000 ppm is considered to be good. European standards limit carbon dioxide to 3,500 ppm. OSHA limits carbon dioxide concentration in the workplace to 5,000 ppm for prolonged periods, and 35,000 ppm for 15 minutes. These higher limits are concerned with avoiding loss of consciousness (fainting), and do not address impaired cognitive performance and energy, which begin to occur at lower concentrations of carbon dioxide.Carbon dioxide concentrations increase as a result of human occupancy, but lag in time behind cumulative occupancy and intake of fresh air. The lower the air exchange rate, the slower the buildup of carbon dioxide to quasi "steady state" concentrations on which the NIOSH and UK guidance are based. Therefore, measurements of carbon dioxide for purposes of assessing the adequacy of ventilation need to be made after an extended period of steady occupancy and ventilation - in schools at least 2 hours, and in offices at least 3 hours - for concentrations to be a reasonable indicator of ventilation adequacy. Portable instruments used to measure carbon dioxide should be calibrated frequently, and outdoor measurements used for calculations should be made close in time to indoor measurements. Corrections for temperature effects on measurements made outdoors may also be necessary.
--d2bf8680bac31c8a2cc4277661d6e0f5_77b3_3c98f
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Facebook vs Twitter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-0-30643-6281-12299-5388aaf9-0300"><img src="http://fbvstwittr.us/3ec76da82e094067a0.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-14-30643-6281-12299-0dc3df21-0300" width="1" /></a> <br />
<center>
<div style="width:550px;background-color:#21D1C6;border-bottom:4px solid #1A1A1A;border-top:4px solid #1A1A1A;padding:10px;"><a href="http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-2-30643-6281-12299-6e1a4795-0300" style="color:#ffffff;text-decoration:none;font-size:25px;padding:10px;"><b><span style="color:#ff0000;">✰</span> Which social network is better? <span style="color:#ff0000;">✰</span> </b></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-2-30643-6281-12299-6e1a4795-0300"><img alt="Which social network is better?" src="http://fbvstwittr.us/0a3fd71b49d8ac1945.jpg" /></a></center>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-12-30643-6281-12299-56de578f-0300]"><img alt="Unsubscribe" src="http://fbvstwittr.us/83c52d62f23c13fd5f.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a align="center" href="http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-20-30643-6281-12299-95dbed83-0300"><img alt="" src="http://fbvstwittr.us/0e26c78a39ca8db5fc.jpg" /></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8px; color: #ffffff;">Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a relatively easy to measure surrogate for indoor pollutants emitted by humans, and correlates with human metabolic activity. Carbon dioxide at levels that are unusually high indoors may cause occupants to grow drowsy, to get headaches, or to function at lower activity levels. Outdoor CO2 levels are usually 350-450 ppm whereas the maximum indoor CO2 level considered acceptable is 1000 ppm. Humans are the main indoor source of carbon dioxide in most buildings. Indoor CO2 levels are an indicator of the adequacy of outdoor air ventilation relative to indoor occupant density and metabolic activity.To eliminate most complaints, the total indoor CO2 level should be reduced to a difference of less than 600 ppm above outdoor levels.[citation needed] The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) considers that indoor air concentrations of carbon dioxide that exceed<a href="http://fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-0-30643-6281-12299-5388aaf9-0300"><img src="http://fbvstwittr.us/3ec76da82e094067a0.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.fbvstwittr.us/clk.248207-32745-14-30643-6281-12299-0dc3df21-0300" width="1" /></a>1,000 ppm are a marker suggesting inadequate ventilation. The UK standards for schools say that carbon dioxide in all teaching and learning spaces, when measured at seated head height and averaged over the whole day should not exceed 1,500 ppm. The whole day refers to normal school hours (i.e. 9:00am to 3:30pm) and includes unoccupied periods such as lunch breaks. In Hong Kong, the EPD established indoor air quality objectives for office buildings and public places in which a carbon dioxide level below 1,000 ppm is considered to be good. European standards limit carbon dioxide to 3,500 ppm. OSHA limits carbon dioxide concentration in the workplace to 5,000 ppm for prolonged periods, and 35,000 ppm for 15 minutes. These higher limits are concerned with avoiding loss of consciousness (fainting), and do not address impaired cognitive performance and energy, which begin to occur at lower concentrations of carbon dioxide.Carbon dioxide concentrations increase as a result of human occupancy, but lag in time behind cumulative occupancy and intake of fresh air. The lower the air exchange rate, the slower the buildup of carbon dioxide to quasi "steady state" concentrations on which the NIOSH and UK guidance are based. Therefore, measurements of carbon dioxide for purposes of assessing the adequacy of ventilation need to be made after an extended period of steady occupancy and ventilation - in schools at least 2 hours, and in offices at least 3 hours - for concentrations to be a reasonable indicator of ventilation adequacy. Portable instruments used to measure carbon dioxide should be calibrated frequently, and outdoor measurements used for calculations should be made close in time to indoor measurements. Corrections for temperature effects on measurements made outdoors may also be necessary.</span></center>
</body>
</html>
--d2bf8680bac31c8a2cc4277661d6e0f5_77b3_3c98f--
------------=_5B0A7C40.2B1287F1--