
| Current Path : /home/ift/mails/33/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //home/ift/mails/33/1532723126.zrspam.335130_2018_07_27 |
From 1744-1954-14773-44-christian.gabriel=shortnote.de@mail.hearinghtuie.bid Fri Jul 27 22:25:26 2018
Return-Path: <1744-1954-14773-44-christian.gabriel=shortnote.de@mail.hearinghtuie.bid>
X-Original-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: cgabriel@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id B31193D200A8E; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:25:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:25:26 +0200
From: "Action on Hearing Loss " <contact@hearinghtuie.bid>
To: <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>
Subject: *****SPAM***** Get back your hearing in as little as 14 days!
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:22:08 -0400
Message-Id: <gh9r63bu8ru0772s-2w6s544v7vzdlkj3-39b5@hearinghtuie.bid>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *******
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_MOSTLY,MPART_ALT_DIFF,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,
RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5B5B7FB6.A0D0C022"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5B5B7FB6.A0D0C022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: SIX MAIN CAUSES OF HEARING LOSS Identify your symptoms Difficulty
in the following conversation and missing parts Ringing,buzzing or whisiting
sound the affected ear Speaking in louder tone than required listening to
music or the tv at a higher than required volume [...]
Content analysis details: (7.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[31.220.43.188 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
1.6 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.4 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to
background
0.8 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?31.220.43.188>]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5B5B7FB6.A0D0C022
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from york.hearinghtuie.bid (unknown [31.220.43.188])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC13D200A84
for <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:25:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=hearinghtuie.bid;
h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=contact@hearinghtuie.bid;
bh=s3Yyj68OZCuCBFApEk7C3bqYQ9Q=;
b=BtOpTZvY6pkRcgQ+esPq1m4HbcTYJ12y+J68kPtj715rUAP0/mRwhR1myoj3hnCRGn/S3zqVz8Vf
SrgV+QQEfFblPo4RStgf+5yDoAVpBjnzuZngfRMYxus2zDufosTZOkm5+tMCmevjIvw9rVERuLVt
KYNSF6sVHPJ/fs2UG+s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=hearinghtuie.bid;
b=g0mI3hud27R2eHoaUh81UPA8HiZoSCYL/GnPaqbpdCjX7VfAgSCG5jf7rKr5qAWTHmCLjaHxKybp
7ivjNTWW+c9Tt01wevsuI8HwEBvo/fiL5Amviz7spCOkXJzddcVWou/G5qgREI1cksRVqriS73K7
3rcD+BnohWKJmImH0ME=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5a9b32493a925e273415cce5e03f63b7"
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:22:08 -0400
From: "Action on Hearing Loss " <contact@hearinghtuie.bid>
Reply-To: "Action on Hearing Loss " <contact@hearinghtuie.bid>
Subject: Get back your hearing in as little as 14 days!
To: <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>
Message-ID: <gh9r63bu8ru0772s-2w6s544v7vzdlkj3-39b5@hearinghtuie.bid>
--5a9b32493a925e273415cce5e03f63b7
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
--5a9b32493a925e273415cce5e03f63b7
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
</head>
<body><a href="http://hearinghtuie.bid/NCfSoRuMdny1MIpDK5uezj5KLSj8EioI_FOv0-cCuYnz"><img border="0" src="http://hearinghtuie.bid/iGULkIL79JHSOS50GQ3j-1KF3z3DPyZvNnFp8nE9Ussc" /> </a>
<div style="margin: auto;
width:650px; padding:22px;
">
<div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:19px;">SIX MAIN CAUSES OF HEARING LOSS</p>
<hr style="border: 1px dashed #00FFFF;" /><a href="http://hearinghtuie.bid/9VQz6lTpcBkapP1RDqyPP0OnS4530n8MRQMZWWC9Do8C"><img src="http://hearinghtuie.bid/1d9d247202159570e5.jpg" /> </a></td>
<td><a href="http://hearinghtuie.bid/9VQz6lTpcBkapP1RDqyPP0OnS4530n8MRQMZWWC9Do8C"><img src="http://hearinghtuie.bid/7386b0ba674ff77003.jpg" style="width:300px" /></a>
<p style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:20px;"> Identify your symptoms</p>
<ul style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:15px;">
<li><strong>Difficulty in the following conversation and missing parts</strong></li>
<li><strong>Ringing,buzzing or whisiting sound the affected ear</strong></li>
<li><strong>Speaking in louder tone than required listening to music or the tv at a higher than required</strong></li>
<li><strong>volume</strong></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>
<center>
<p style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:16px;"><a href="http://hearinghtuie.bid/9VQz6lTpcBkapP1RDqyPP0OnS4530n8MRQMZWWC9Do8C" style=""><strong>CLICK TO KNOW TO MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS</strong></a></p>
</center>
<hr /></div>
</div>
<p align="center" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:13px;"><span style="font-size:11px;">If you'd not prefer not to recive future emails<a href="http://hearinghtuie.bid/T5WYIAvnTFm7NvXS20Itg8ktaAWKQpSF0jHvH2qPMXE8"> Unsubcribe here</a></span></p>
<address style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:11px;">394 Tea Berry Lane Cumberland, WI 54829</span></address>
<div><br />
<br />
<br />
<center>
<p style="color:white;font-size:9px">he problem Making the deployed equipment accessible, by extending its server role beyond the local network, requires either manual configuration of port forwarding at the network gateway (which is usually a CPE), or application-level workarounds that initiate connections from the deployed equipment to additional intermediate servers used for "merging" those "firewall punching" connections and connections from the actual clients. Both approaches have their downsides – manual CPE configuration is usually either inconvenient or not possible, while using additional intermediate servers increases complexity and cost. For example, an online computer game (which acts as a client) requires communication with a game server for exchanging gameplay data such as the movement of players, their different associated parameters, etc. In order to make it possible for a game server to provide such gameplay data updates to its online clients, those clients must be made accessible to the server. Usually, clients initiate connections to the game server, creating that way implicit mappings, which provide servers with the required communication channels. However, such connections can become idle and subsequently closed by the network gateways, leading to the necessity of maintaining them by using a form of keepalive messages. Maintaining client-initiated implicit mappings alive is necessary because network gateways delete such mappings when they become idle, as a result of treating them as regular client connections; such implicit mappings are preserved by passing keepalive messages through NAT devices or firewalls. Thus, keeping such connections alive requires a constant exchange of otherwise useless keepalive messages between clients and servers, as a workaround that increases network chatter, wastes network bandwidth and CPU cycles, and decreases the autonomy of battery-powered devices. Additionally, some network applications (for example, FTP) require dynamic opening of multiple connections, which involves application-level gateways (ALGs) and additionally increases complexity. PCP as a solution PCP allows equipment and applications to create explicit mappings between an external IP address, protocol and port, and an internal IP address, protocol and port. With such explicit mappings in place, inbound communication can reach the hosts behind a NAT or firewall, which either expands their server roles beyond boundaries of local networks, or makes use of various services simplified and less resource-consuming. Created mappings are permanent to the extent of having a known lifetime that can be extended, which is similar to the way Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) implements its leases. At the same time, PCP allows applications to create additional mappings dynamically as required, which reduces or eliminates the need for having ALG-enabled NAT devices and firewalls. Created explicit mappings have a known lifetime, commonly several hours, with no need for application-level keepalive messages to be exchanged between hosts and servers for the purpose of preserving the mapping. As a result, network usage and power consumption are reduced, and application-level keepalive logic no longer needs to be implemented at client and server sides. The PCP mapping response provides the application with associated externally visible parameters (IP address, protocol and port) that can then be announced to other clients in application-specific ways so incoming connections can be established. Additionally, PCP can inform applications when the external IP address is changed while a mapping is already established. Various types of NAT can be handled by PCP, providing support for NAT64, NAT66, and NAT44; inclusion of PCP into IPv4 and IPv6 firewall devices is also supported. PCP is designed to be used on both large-scale aggregation points (for example, as part of carrier-grade NATs), and inside less expensive consumer-grade devices. Both long-term (for an IP camera or a temperature sensor acting as a server, for example) and short-term mappings (while playing an online computer game, for example) are supported. PCP supports transport layer protocols that use 16-bit port numbers (for example, TCP, UDP, Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) or Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP). Protocols that do not use port numbers (for example, Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP), Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP), ICMP or ICMPv6) are supported for IPv4 firewall, IPv6 firewall and NPTv6 (IPv6 prefix translation) functions, but cannot be supported by more than one client per external IP address in the case of NAT. The PCP specification does not define a mechanism for dealing with multi-homed networks (which have multiple network gateways or default routes). It is nonetheless possible to implement PCP in such networks using a coordination mechanism such as conntrackd. However, if the different networks each have their own external IP address(es), a given PCP mapping can only use one or the other because the protocol requires one specific external IP address to be provided to the client. If that network should then become unavailable the PCP mapping would have to be updated to use an external IP address from the other network..</p>
</center>
</div>
<div><a href="http://hearinghtuie.bid/MJPc9i2lsfpb7s4F-qdK4W2AXZmxndcGtTVzpDAhr-9O"><img src="http://hearinghtuie.bid/33e3dbb044778e7830.png" /></a></div>
</body>
</html>
--5a9b32493a925e273415cce5e03f63b7--
------------=_5B5B7FB6.A0D0C022--