| Current Path : /proc/thread-self/root/home/ift/mails/14/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //proc/thread-self/root/home/ift/mails/14/1479520166.zrspam.149205_2016_11_19 |
From pqgzsmo@ff02.com Sat Nov 19 02:49:26 2016
Return-Path: <pqgzsmo@ff02.com>
X-Original-To: tjungblut@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: tjungblut@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id 4640E375219CC; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:49:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:49:26 +0100
From: "Chantelle Bond" <Bond_Blessing@infinity.comm.com>
To: tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de
Subject: *****SPAM***** Why we stopped our communication? I expected more!
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:45:21 -0500
Message-Id: <3045761094946-QVUDGKGYBPPBHMXBWXVUOYXUO@tntj.infinity.comm.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=24.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95,
CK_HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP,CK_HELO_GENERIC,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2,
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,PLING_QUERY,PYZOR_CHECK,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_PSBL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_582FAFA6.B677142D"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_582FAFA6.B677142D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Cancel all the plans for tomorrow Hey, I'm Maria There will
be a homeparty for us [...]
Content analysis details: (24.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[111.251.40.177 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[111.251.40.177 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[111.251.40.177 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
0.0 CK_HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname
(Split IP)
0.2 CK_HELO_GENERIC Relay used name indicative of a Dynamic Pool or
Generic rPTR
0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP No description available.
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?111.251.40.177>]
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[111.251.40.177 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99%
[score: 0.9803]
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.4 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
0.3 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check
1.0 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark
3.6 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr
2)
0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_582FAFA6.B677142D
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from 111-251-40-177.dynamic.hinet.net (111-251-40-177.dynamic.hinet.net [111.251.40.177])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F143752196A
for <tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:49:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3045761094946-QVUDGKGYBPPBHMXBWXVUOYXUO@tntj.infinity.comm.com>
From: "Chantelle Bond" <Bond_Blessing@infinity.comm.com>
Subject: Why we stopped our communication? I expected more!
To: tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:45:21 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cancel all the plans for tomorrow<br>Hey, I'm Maria<br>There will be a <a href="http://sexywoman2.top/?u=79h8kwf&o=epgkvze&t="style="color:#0B7303;">homeparty for us</a>
------------=_582FAFA6.B677142D--