
| Current Path : /proc/thread-self/root/home/ift/mails/15/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : //proc/thread-self/root/home/ift/mails/15/1479662066.zrspam.150112_2016_11_20 |
From kbibhpqkuoh@itelgua.com Sun Nov 20 18:14:26 2016
Return-Path: <kbibhpqkuoh@itelgua.com>
X-Original-To: tjungblut@ift-informatik.de
Delivered-To: tjungblut@ift-informatik.de
Received: by ift-informatik.de (Postfix, from userid 5555)
id DF29B3752550D; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:14:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost by h2486555.stratoserver.net
with SpamAssassin (version 3.4.0);
Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:14:25 +0100
From: "Honesty Crenshaw" <Crenshaw_Amaya@dvcare.com>
To: tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: Why we stopped our communication? I expected more!
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:14:21 -0200
Message-Id: <67194993967-LEWPRVYBFTWFGADYUIJNNJYSA@susg.dvcare.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
h2486555.stratoserver.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ***************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=27.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,
HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
PLING_QUERY,PYZOR_CHECK,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,
RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_PSBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,
RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_5831D9F1.E36FEF5A"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------------=_5831D9F1.E36FEF5A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Spam detection software, running on the system "h2486555.stratoserver.net",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Cancel all the plans for tomorrow Hey, I'm Maria There will
be a homeparty for us [...]
Content analysis details: (27.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[216.212.251.189 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[216.212.251.189 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
3.5 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (Split
IP)
0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP No description available.
1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.212.251.189>]
2.4 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
[216.212.251.189 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[216.212.251.189 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[216.212.251.189 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99%
[score: 0.9803]
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.4 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[216.212.251.189 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted
0.3 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check
1.0 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark
0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
------------=_5831D9F1.E36FEF5A
Content-Type: message/rfc822; x-spam-type=original
Content-Description: original message before SpamAssassin
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from 216.212.251.189.rose.net (216.212.251.189.rose.net [216.212.251.189])
by ift-informatik.de (Postfix) with SMTP id B20443752550C
for <tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:14:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <67194993967-LEWPRVYBFTWFGADYUIJNNJYSA@susg.dvcare.com>
From: "Honesty Crenshaw" <Crenshaw_Amaya@dvcare.com>
Subject: Re: Why we stopped our communication? I expected more!
To: tobias.jungblut@ift-informatik.de
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 15:14:21 -0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cancel all the plans for tomorrow<br>Hey, I'm Maria<br>There will be a <a href="http://sexywoman1.top/?u=239wkwf&o=yh4p8zr&t="style="color:#0B7303;">homeparty for us</a>
------------=_5831D9F1.E36FEF5A--