| Current Path : /var/mail/shortnote.de/cgabriel/.Trash/cur/ |
Linux ift1.ift-informatik.de 5.4.0-216-generic #236-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 11 19:53:21 UTC 2025 x86_64 |
| Current File : /var/mail/shortnote.de/cgabriel/.Trash/cur/1612944593.M349140P42482.ift3,S=9491,W=9729:2,Sa |
Return-Path: <12574-1153-27627-3358-christian.gabriel=shortnote.de@mail.humetrac.digital> X-Original-To: christian.gabriel@shortnote.de Delivered-To: christian.gabriel@shortnote.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ift3.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A55C2C00A9 for <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:31:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.803 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.803 tagged_above=2 required=6.31 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_99=3.5, BAYES_999=0.2, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.1, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ift3.ift-informatik.de (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=humetrac.digital; domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.from=bloodsugar@humetrac.digital header.d=humetrac.digital Received: from ift3.home ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ift3.ift-informatik.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlDtp92OgVs5 for <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:31:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by ift3.home (Postfix, from userid 177) id F19C82C0069; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:31:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from golf.humetrac.digital (unknown [172.20.20.1]) by ift3.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8972C0069 for <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:31:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=humetrac.digital; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=bloodsugar@humetrac.digital; bh=ds+B+3enNGv6HCaJlHzsEdXVq+U=; b=uV7ZK6zvIZkjtnzXUrIJ6xsnCfYH4zDrVrNQS/OnnceHq7EyB089rhe4m/coYz5XC9xUUm+alg5Y q9U3L1e1NZiTB8Z679R1CzTInfxH8B91Pf431MFidpinRq3bC9G2R9KCHRwZH/HxQ3cAI7Ngon9Q J2PxGvNuvw0l8yRz9y8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=humetrac.digital; b=kw5Wp4wtG096U7+a2JbYrzQCsxZK0VWrJ1Uhjhgp89RlojxAdo1H5glzuIWlZhjW7WbtBOIsTfL8 dFY1C+7PX2A6mlM43sX4xWchNgwIRgCPKAjZ5/ldHwDAqz8x+XZPePriu2iuRG9l75UhPqjvG5AT DQQdGNrv5E35NPF5Tts=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="71784528ab20241438e09b14da11d986" Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:31:23 -0600 From: "Reverse Diabetes" <bloodsugar@humetrac.digital> Reply-To: "Reverse Diabetes" <bloodsugar@humetrac.digital> Subject: Why Metformin Makes You Sick To: <christian.gabriel@shortnote.de> Message-ID: <vul7grt52yyfqtqw-ybguw353qh033frk-6beb@humetrac.digital> --71784528ab20241438e09b14da11d986 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This email must be viewed in HTML mode. --71784528ab20241438e09b14da11d986 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <title></title> <style type="text/css"> </style> </head> <body><a href="http://humetrac.digital/fQEAg504WYq4CV6PBoSZlECeynsYeJi7L-IkWXRBB8IvNw"><img border="0" src="http://humetrac.digital/uPPdCKyViLzamUnU3zc7N_3fLWtdbg8jsgxSPvqMl_R5Dw" /> </a> <div id="INHERIT" name="11px" title="6px"> <div style="border: 7px hidden #ffffff; width: 650px; background-color: #ffffff"> <div> <table style="padding-top: 10px;width:650px; font-size:18px;"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p>A shocking discovery by a Texas doctor reveals why Metformin makes you sick.</p> <p>Doctors are urging every American with diabetes to watch this trending news story:</p> <p align="left"><a href="http://humetrac.digital/F8WnKUeUNEHGcXiQLALXVhefgM6mLgz0lvfX6w8aiaZ-9Q"><img src="http://humetrac.digital/b719511fc9dee376a3.jpg" /></a></p> <p><a href="http://humetrac.digital/F8WnKUeUNEHGcXiQLALXVhefgM6mLgz0lvfX6w8aiaZ-9Q"><b>=> Watch the news story here </b></a></p> <p>To your health,</p> <p>-Jim</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left" style="font-size:12px;"><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://humetrac.digital/FKOa9oFjBd9J-nNwrzJ5RzJU9s54ENvtB_LhU5_YKIi5dA"><img alt="Please UnSub_scribe Here!!" src="http://humetrac.digital/752ad3eb76c55ab280.jpg" /></a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <br /> </div> <table style="width: 620px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 5px solid white;"> <tbody> <tr> <td><span style=" padding:0px; padding:0px;color:#ffffff; font-size:11px;">A Business Insider article wrote about a controversy in September 2012 w two Wikimedia Foundation employees were found to have been "running a PR business on the side and editing Wikipedia on behalf of their clients." Unfair treatment of women In 2015, The Atlantic published a story by Emma Paling about a contributor who was able to obtain no relief from the Arbitration Committee for off-wiki harassment. Paling s a then-sitting Arbitrator speaking about bias against women on the Arbitration Committee. In the online magazine Slate, David Auerbach criticized the Arbitration Committee's decision to block a woman indefinitely without simultaneously blocking her "chief antagonists" in the December 2014 Gender Gap Task Force case. He mentions his own experience with what he s "the unblockables"—abrasive editors who can away with complaints against them because t are enough supporters, and that he h observed a "general indifference or even hostility to outside opinion" on the English Wikipedia. Auerbach considers the systematic defense of vulgar language use by insiders as a symptom of the toxicity he describes. In January 2015, The Guardian reported that the Arbitration Committee h banned five feminist editors from gender-related articles on a case related to the Gamergate controversy, while including s from a Wikipedia editor alleging unfair treatment. Other commentators, including from Gawker and ThinkProgress, provided ditional analysis while sourcing from The Guardian's story. Reports in The Washington Post, Slate and Social Text described these articles as "flawed" or factually inaccurate, pointing out that the Arbitration case h not concluded as at the time of publishing; no editor h been banned. After the result was published, Gawker wrote that "ArbCom ruled to punish six editors who could be broly classified as  9;anti-Gamergate' and five who are 'pro-Gamergate'." All of the supposed "Five Horsemen"[non sequitur] were among the editors punished, with one of them being the sole editor banned due to this case. An article ed "ArbitrationGate" regarding this situation was created (and quickly deleted) on Wikipedia, while The Guardian later issued a correction to their article. The Committee and the Wikimedia Foundation issued press statements that the Gamergate case was in response to the atmosp of the Gamergate article resembling a "battlefield" due to "various sides of the discussion violated community policies and guidelines on conduct", and that the committee was fulfilling its role to "uphold a civil, constructive atmosp" on Wikipedia. The committee also wrote that it "does not rule on the content of articles, or make judgements on the personal views of parties to the case". Michael Mandiberg, writing in Social T ext, remained unconvinced. Lack of verifiable identities Scandals involving ministrators and arbitrators David Boothroyd, a Wikipedia editor and a Labour Party (United Kingdom) , created controversy in 2009, when Wikipedia Review contributor "Tarantino" discovered that he committed sockpuppeting, editing under the accounts "Dbiv", "Fys", and "Sam Blacketer", none of which ackledged his real identity. After ing ministrator status with one account, then losing it for inappropriate use of the ministrative tools, Boothroyd regained ministrator status with the Sam Blacketer sockpuppet account in April 2007. Later in 2007, Boothroyd's Sam Blacketer account became part of the English Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee. Under the Sam Blacketer account, Boothroyd edited many articles related to United Kingdom politics, including that of rival Conservative Party leer David Cameron. Boothroyd then resigned as an ministrator and as an arbitrator. E ssjay controversy Main article: Essjay controversy </span><br /> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <a href="http://humetrac.digital/HKDQ7LvUo_GWz8bHKK6xCVPdzuXuX34hjLvIMnFhetThqA"><img src="http://humetrac.digital/45077bd193fe1be4f6.jpg" /></a></div> </body> </html> --71784528ab20241438e09b14da11d986--